Bunny Trails

When it just doesn't fit anywhere else.
Ken
Posts: 18410
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: Christians and Trans

Post by Ken »

temporal1 wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 2:19 pm
RZehr wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:44 am Being a man is hard.
Yes. Thanks for saying it.

i admit, my view is not from insight, but from loss. losses.
husband, father, brother, grandfathers. uncles. brother in law. pastor. employers. friends. God designs us to carry on. He provides. but there is no substitute for what is missing.
Life can be hard for everyone, men and women.

But the suicide rate for men in the US is 3-4 times higher than for women. Which doesn't necessarily mean that men have it harder. But more likely means that men are less good at coping with adversity than women.
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
RZehr

Re: Christians and Trans

Post by RZehr »

Ken wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:33 pm
temporal1 wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 2:19 pm
RZehr wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:44 am Being a man is hard.
Yes. Thanks for saying it.

i admit, my view is not from insight, but from loss. losses.
husband, father, brother, grandfathers. uncles. brother in law. pastor. employers. friends. God designs us to carry on. He provides. but there is no substitute for what is missing.
Life can be hard for everyone, men and women.

But the suicide rate for men in the US is 3-4 times higher than for women. Which doesn't necessarily mean that men have it harder. But more likely means that men are less good at coping with adversity than women.
Wait. The elevated suicide rates for LGBTQ is indicative of their hard life, but for men it just means that women are better at dealing with adversity? I see.
0 x
Soloist

Re: Christians and Trans

Post by Soloist »

RZehr wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:49 pm
Ken wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:33 pm
temporal1 wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 2:19 pm Yes. Thanks for saying it.

i admit, my view is not from insight, but from loss. losses.
husband, father, brother, grandfathers. uncles. brother in law. pastor. employers. friends. God designs us to carry on. He provides. but there is no substitute for what is missing.
Life can be hard for everyone, men and women.

But the suicide rate for men in the US is 3-4 times higher than for women. Which doesn't necessarily mean that men have it harder. But more likely means that men are less good at coping with adversity than women.
Wait. The elevated suicide rates for LGBTQ is indicative of their hard life, but for men it just means that women are better at dealing with adversity? I see.
Yeah from what I’ve always heard women make suicide attempts, men commit suicide.

Also, women have “documented” much higher rates of mood disorders, but it’s well known that men underreport mental health issues.
0 x
temporal1

Re: Christians and Trans

Post by temporal1 »

temporal1 wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 2:19 pm
RZehr wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:44 am Being a man is hard.
Yes. Thanks for saying it.

i admit, my view is not from insight, but from loss. losses.
husband, father, brother, grandfathers. uncles. brother in law. pastor. employers. friends. God designs us to carry on. He provides. but there is no substitute for what is missing.
i believe there are those present who understand my thoughts here.
interesting-enough, of all the losses my family has suffered, none were from suicide/attempted suicide, i’m grateful to be able to say.

i began learning about the special place males hold at about 10, when my grandfather died suddenly.
over years, i witnessed the ongoing loss it made on a big family, he left 9 adult children, many grandchildren .. our vibrant, busy family survived, but never the same. years later, my siblings and cousins have remarked similarly.

each one leaves a hole. scar tissue forms around the hole, but the hole remains.

i wonder if, as a culture, we could somehow convey to young boys+teens how important and special they are, HOW MUCH THEY ARE NEEDED, if this would help them resist lots of temptations that harm themselves and others? humans have a God-given sense of social responsibility that should be valued+nurtured. a TON of sin is resisted just because the potential sinner realizes his sin will harm his loved ones, and this price is too high. people who don’t value themselves more easily fall into sins+crimes.

when i think of so many men in prisons, i’m sad, all those men are needed in productive society.
it’s a failure+waste. not God’s plan.
0 x
User avatar
Robert
Site Janitor
Posts: 9058
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 4:16 pm
Affiliation: Anabaptist

Re: Christians and Trans

Post by Robert »

Soloist wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 5:00 pm it’s well known that men underreport mental health issues.
Why did you look directly at me when you said that? :o
0 x
Try hard not to offend. Try harder not to be offended.
Just because you are paranoid, doesn't mean they are not after you.
I think I am funnier than I really am.
steve-in-kville

Re: Christians and Trans

Post by steve-in-kville »

RZehr wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:49 pm
Ken wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:33 pm
temporal1 wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 2:19 pm Yes. Thanks for saying it.

i admit, my view is not from insight, but from loss. losses.
husband, father, brother, grandfathers. uncles. brother in law. pastor. employers. friends. God designs us to carry on. He provides. but there is no substitute for what is missing.
Life can be hard for everyone, men and women.

But the suicide rate for men in the US is 3-4 times higher than for women. Which doesn't necessarily mean that men have it harder. But more likely means that men are less good at coping with adversity than women.
Wait. The elevated suicide rates for LGBTQ is indicative of their hard life, but for men it just means that women are better at dealing with adversity? I see.
And we lose 22 combat vets a day to suicide (on average). They had it hard, too.

Just sayin'.
0 x
Josh

Re: “Former government lawyers say we need to limit the president's ability to deploy U.S. troops at home”

Post by Josh »

Judas Maccabeus wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:56 pm
Josh wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:33 am
Judas Maccabeus wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 5:42 am

Their justification is part of the “elastic clause “, necessary and proper. In the judgment of generations of courts, they have been found constitutionally appropriate.
It seems like a “clause” one can drive a truck through, where every single thing ends up subject to federal jurisdiction, which is very much the opposite of what we know the intent of the framers was.
There was considerable debate there. Jefferson’s ideas largely lost out.
Yes, and now we have a gargantuan federal government with a gargantuan national debt, with a completely unsustainable future.
0 x
Jazman

Re: “Former government lawyers say we need to limit the president's ability to deploy U.S. troops at home”

Post by Jazman »

Josh wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 3:44 am
Judas Maccabeus wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:56 pm
Josh wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:33 am

It seems like a “clause” one can drive a truck through, where every single thing ends up subject to federal jurisdiction, which is very much the opposite of what we know the intent of the framers was.
There was considerable debate there. Jefferson’s ideas largely lost out.
Yes, and now we have a gargantuan federal government with a gargantuan national debt, with a completely unsustainable future.
There's some truth in that, but, if the far right got its rhetorical way... ie shut down, gut, corrupt the departments and agencies they complain about... well the unintended consequences of that would also be unsustainable...
Conservative prudence and good character would incrementally work to improve the different agencies and areas of governance.
0 x
Ken
Posts: 18410
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: “Former government lawyers say we need to limit the president's ability to deploy U.S. troops at home”

Post by Ken »

Josh wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 3:44 am
Judas Maccabeus wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:56 pm
Josh wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2024 11:33 am

It seems like a “clause” one can drive a truck through, where every single thing ends up subject to federal jurisdiction, which is very much the opposite of what we know the intent of the framers was.
There was considerable debate there. Jefferson’s ideas largely lost out.
Yes, and now we have a gargantuan federal government with a gargantuan national debt, with a completely unsustainable future.
In the past 70 years, it is state and local government that has grown the most, not the Federal government. Which is what I thought you actually wanted to see. In fact, as a percentage of the population it is the Federal government that has shrunk in the past 50 years. This is from the Cato Institute

Image

Image
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
Josh

Re: “Former government lawyers say we need to limit the president's ability to deploy U.S. troops at home”

Post by Josh »

You and I both know a great deal of those state and local positions are funded by and controlled by federal grants.
0 x
Post Reply