.. I do not want a government deciding on my morality.
in my view, only from what i’ve read, there are sufficient non-morality points to decide in favor of LM.
this case seems to highlight the “special” (not equal) value+power of homosexuals (via their organized bloc) in courts of law.
and in society. it’s bullying. and, it’s destructive.
the trend is decidedly “minority rules” over majority rules.
self-serving political blocs have taken the 1964 “precedent,” new law (experiment) intended to benefit a special specific demograph, descendents of authentic slaves, and mercilessly exploited it beyond recognition for their own gain.
i would like to imagine, if i were such a descendent, i would be LIVID at the nonsensical exploitation of law that was enacted with such specific hope. it’s become a godless hell for ordinary people, destruction of traditional family units, a major competition to see who can pirate the most dollars from taxpayers, and bully (the majority) through heavy-handed force of the sword.
that’s human law/human reasoning for ya. scriptures warn.
less cowering to language trickery is needed. more eyes wide open.
imho.
perhaps as BRIAN PECKFORD described in Canada, in the video you just shared, but it disappeared,
their courts have trended toward reflecting public opinion, away from actual law. throw out the word, “lesbian!” and eyes are blinded to other details. “give them what they want, and hope they’ll go away.” (fat chance.) proven over decades, following the deceit of, “consenting adults.”
