You focus on their point of view. I disagree with a whole lot from all three channels, I think they are all extremely worldly.
But here's something that really distinguishes them: the emails that show Fox executives and stars basically saying they shouldn't tell us the truth because it might affect their ratings. That they have to tickle people's ears with what they want to hear. No suggestion at all that their job is to tell people the truth. I just haven't seen anything like it for the other networks.
Calling someone crazy and a liar in private, then giving her a star slot on their shows the next day to boost ratings.
And yet, Fox is not banned for this? Honestly, I'd be fine with banning all political videos, make people think for themselves and not just forward things. But banning just the stations that might give an alternate point of view seems pretty blatant.
So what is it about how they deal with wrong stories that matters?Robert wrote:All news sites get things wrong in an attempt to be first. It is how they deal with wrong stories that matter to me.