Re: Is Donald Trump the Antichrist?
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2024 5:09 pm
Where Mennonites and others connect
https://forum.mennonet.com/
I have just published my book on the end times entitled, "Fulfilled in Christ". Perhaps you would be interested in a free copy?Judas Maccabeus wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 3:20 pmPreterism?I have not heard that one since grad. School. Are you serious or sending me off?gcdonner wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 1:06 pmAre you ignoring the time context?Judas Maccabeus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 26, 2024 9:39 pm Dear children, this is the last hour; and as you have heard that the antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come. This is how we know it is the last hour. They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us."
1 John 2:18-19
He is just one of potentially many.
The anti-christ in the first century was an indicator of it being...not the last days, or the last time, but the last hour! Get it? It's a done deal! Maybe y'all are still waiting for the last minute or the last second 2000 years later?
Oh well, as many on here will tell you, I am pretty "wild". I'm one of those guys who believes in accepting scripture for what it says rather than what we would like it to say or think it says. There is such a thing as audience relevance and the need to remember that the bible was NOT written TO US but rather FOR US. Always interpret scripture with scripture and not with the newspaper in your left hand as many futurists are won't to do.
Ah, maybe you know where that reference "scripture in one hand, the newspaper in the other" comes from? I was listening to a podcast just yesterday that referenced that; I believe it's the words of Karl Barth (very conservative theologian btw). I get your point and maybe agree somewhat, but I think Barth had a good point as well.gcdonner wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:37 pmOh well, as many on here will tell you, I am pretty "wild". I'm one of those guys who believes in accepting scripture for what it says rather than what we would like it to say or think it says. There is such a thing as audience relevance and the need to remember that the bible was NOT written TO US but rather FOR US. Always interpret scripture with scripture and not with the newspaper in your left hand as many futurists are won't to do.
Once you see the Seven Hills reference to Rome, a lot of things Preterists say make sense. I'm not purely in that camp, but they have a lot of good insights.Jazman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:07 am Ah, maybe you know where that reference "scripture in one hand, the newspaper in the other" comes from? I was listening to a podcast just yesterday that referenced that; I believe it's the words of Karl Barth (very conservative theologian btw). I get your point and maybe agree somewhat, but I think Barth had a good point as well.
I’ve always been open to the idea some of Revelation might have already happened, and also that some parts of it could happen multiple times.Bootstrap wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 8:27 amOnce you see the Seven Hills reference to Rome, a lot of things Preterists say make sense. I'm not purely in that camp, but they have a lot of good insights.Jazman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:07 am Ah, maybe you know where that reference "scripture in one hand, the newspaper in the other" comes from? I was listening to a podcast just yesterday that referenced that; I believe it's the words of Karl Barth (very conservative theologian btw). I get your point and maybe agree somewhat, but I think Barth had a good point as well.
How about Benny Hinn or a myriad of other futurist speculators?Jazman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:07 amAh, maybe you know where that reference "scripture in one hand, the newspaper in the other" comes from? I was listening to a podcast just yesterday that referenced that; I believe it's the words of Karl Barth (very conservative theologian btw). I get your point and maybe agree somewhat, but I think Barth had a good point as well.gcdonner wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 10:37 pmOh well, as many on here will tell you, I am pretty "wild". I'm one of those guys who believes in accepting scripture for what it says rather than what we would like it to say or think it says. There is such a thing as audience relevance and the need to remember that the bible was NOT written TO US but rather FOR US. Always interpret scripture with scripture and not with the newspaper in your left hand as many futurists are won't to do.
The one part of the Revelation I don't really have a grasp of time on is Rev 20, though there are some Preterists who cut that 1K years down to 7 years. I haven't been able to justify that. Suffice it to say Rev 21-22 for me a clear pictures of the New Covenant, especially in the light of Hebrews 12:22 and following.Josh wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 9:23 amI’ve always been open to the idea some of Revelation might have already happened, and also that some parts of it could happen multiple times.Bootstrap wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 8:27 amOnce you see the Seven Hills reference to Rome, a lot of things Preterists say make sense. I'm not purely in that camp, but they have a lot of good insights.Jazman wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 7:07 am Ah, maybe you know where that reference "scripture in one hand, the newspaper in the other" comes from? I was listening to a podcast just yesterday that referenced that; I believe it's the words of Karl Barth (very conservative theologian btw). I get your point and maybe agree somewhat, but I think Barth had a good point as well.
My own view: These things were meaningful to the first Christians who read the Revelation, and Rome was a big part of their reading. In subsequent generations, the same imagery has been very applicable to other situations Christians experience. The final consummation of the Revelation is still shrouded to us. We do not know how close we are to that time, or how long it will take.gcdonner wrote: ↑Thu Feb 29, 2024 3:47 pmThe one part of the Revelation I don't really have a grasp of time on is Rev 20, though there are some Preterists who cut that 1K years down to 7 years. I haven't been able to justify that. Suffice it to say Rev 21-22 for me a clear pictures of the New Covenant, especially in the light of Hebrews 12:22 and following.