Valerie wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 9:28 pm
ohio jones wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 9:12 pm
temporal1 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 24, 2023 2:06 pm
The remarkable thing is how consistently pro life DJT has been...
Since 2016 anyway. Back in 1999 he was pro-choice.
Meanwhile, in 1982 Senator Biden voted in favor of a constitutional amendment to overturn Roe v. Wade.
(Caveats: The vote was in the Judiciary Committee and did not advance to the full Senate. A year later, he voted against a similar measure.)
He took a stand. Perhaps he became more educated about abortion. Who hasn't?
Biden is Catholic. In 1982 he may have let the faith he came from influence him more than it obviously does now. Now he is pro abortion, pro transgender, pro gay. Pro Hunter regardless of the obvious.
As a Mennonite man said to me, it doesn't matter where you've been but where you're going.
They both changed their beliefs about abortions
For me, when comparing policies, and behaviors, “in elected office” is a different animal than private citizens.
There are different obligations involved. There are oaths of office.
i realize opposing politicians and msm have no interest in discernment, not wrt DJT.
If the shoe was on the other foot ..
Not much to speculate about.
Until 2016, DJT was courted by the DNC. He was loved and included in all matters, including weddings.
- - - - - - -
i believe he saw reality in the DNC, as have others who have left. That is, the party is run as a cabal, a mob, a crime family.
i couldn’t be more sorry to say that. Thus, the figurehead is meaningless. RFK is the current example. Not the first.
The RNC is not untouched. Just not as far down the rabbit hole.