SCOTUS rules against Biden student loan handout

[Ken]

.. There is no higher court so they can get away with it at the risk of their reputations which are now in tatters.

wow. quite a statement.
only by those who mistakenly believed they owned the courts, and/or thought they could bully their way without regard to due process.

biden should be scolded by SCOTUS for his leading and intentional role in it.

It is a true statement. The reputation of the court is at an all-time low. Whether that matters in the short-term is debatable. But it probably does in the long-term if they want to maintain their legitimacy. For example, judicial review itself isn't found anywhere in the Constitution. Nowhere in the Constitution is the Court granted the explicit authority to strike down the actions of the legislative or executive branches. It is simply a doctrine that the Court has asserted based on its public standing and legitimacy.

[Josh]

Interesting point of view, Ken. Would you agree that Roe vs Wade exceeded the Court’s constitutional authority, as did Wickard, Brown vs Board of Ed., and Comstock?

[temporal1]

There are true believers. There are True Believers.

There can be hope the U.S. will not fall into mob rule. The internet is proving to be a test.

It is a true statement. The reputation of the court is at an all-time low. ..

Be cautious chasing after the same people who brought you Nick Sandmann, Jussie Smollett, BLM, etc. They will leave you in a lurch as you fall over the cliff of their lies.

biden is playing with fire inciting a riot over SCOTUS. Former presidents had more class.

[Ken]

Interesting point of view, Ken. Would you agree that Roe vs Wade exceeded the Court’s constitutional authority, as did Wickard, Brown vs Board of Ed., and Comstock?

In all of those cases the plaintiffs clearly had standing and so those cases were all properly before the court.

In Brown v. Board of Education, for example, the Brown family and 12 other black families sued the Topeka School Board for prohibiting their children from attending their local school paid for by their tax dollars and forcing them to bus their children to a black school much further away. That is clear standing. They were suffering a very real injury and 14th Amendment violation.

[Ken]

biden is playing with fire inciting a riot over SCOTUS. Former presidents had more class.

Yes...so much more class





















It just goes on and on....

[temporal1]

Objecting to, disagreeing with, are to be expected, do not compare with attempting to wholly dismantle/reconfigure, esp by way of low-information mob mentality. Pelosi suggesting term limits for SCOTUS is “good for belly laughs.”

[Josh]

Polite request: MN does not need to be plastered with Trump tweets. Anyone who wants to read them can go get on Twitter and read them (in context).

[mike]

Polite request: MN does not need to be plastered with Trump tweets. Anyone who wants to read them can go get on Twitter and read them (in context).

I say it's fair game if someone makes the claim that former presidents had more class. Trump would be exhibit A in that discussion.

[temporal1]

Polite request: MN does not need to be plastered with Trump tweets. Anyone who wants to read them can go get on Twitter and read them (in context).

I say it's fair game if someone makes the claim that former presidents had more class. Trump would be exhibit A in that discussion.

i also dislike “plastering” the forum with tasteless graphics. it’s allowed.
to clarify, when i wrote, “former presidents,” i wasn’t referring to ALL. LBJ was swarthy and tasteless, racist, there were others.

some are poor with reading comprehension, combined with enjoying assaulting the senses, their works speak for them.
in general, in history, elected leaders who encourage respect for the different branches of gov, leave a better legacy.

for biden to blatantly attempt to skirt Congress, then blame SCOTUS for not allowing it, is low.
his personal decades IN Congress make it many times worse. what a scoundrel.

[mike]

Polite request: MN does not need to be plastered with Trump tweets. Anyone who wants to read them can go get on Twitter and read them (in context).

I say it's fair game if someone makes the claim that former presidents had more class. Trump would be exhibit A in that discussion.

i also dislike “plastering” the forum with tasteless graphics. it’s allowed.
to clarify, when i wrote, “former presidents,” i wasn’t referring to ALL. LBJ was swarthy and tasteless, racist, there were others.

some are poor with reading comprehension, combined with enjoying assaulting the senses, their works speak for them.
in general, in history, elected leaders who encourage respect for the different branches of gov, leave a better legacy.

for biden to blatantly attempt to skirt Congress, then blame SCOTUS for not allowing it, is low.
his personal decades IN Congress make it many times worse. what a scoundrel.

I don't necessarily disagree with you about Biden, but if that's what happened, then sure.