What political office has EITHER of them ever held, and what local or state elections have EITHER of them ever won that would suggest to you that either of them are skilled enough politicians to win nationwide elections in the US? Neither of them has won a single vote in any election for dogcatcher or school board much less ever won an election. Political amateurs are always running for president in every election but it is always just a vanity exercise because they are amateurs (Carly Fiorina, Marianne Williamson, Andrew Yang, Herman Cain, Ralph Nader, etc.). And putting together a winning national campaign in a country this large is a massive undertaking.Josh wrote: ↑Sat Apr 15, 2023 11:57 am If RFK Jr and Vivek ran for President it would mean our democracy would heal and both sides would have to seek compromise and return to living in one country. And both of them would point out very serious problems with how the 1% are fleecing the 99% in this country.
That is why the global elites NEVER want to see an election like this.
Only four presidents in history were elected without holding higher office before winning the presidency: Zachary Taylor, Ulysses S. Grant, Dwight Eisenhower, and Donald Trump. And Taylor, Grant and Eisenhower were the top wartime military generals of their time before winning the presidency.
Neither RFKjr or Vivek are remotely comparable to popular victorious wartime generals like Taylor, Grant, and Eisenhower who all had MASSIVE popular support. And neither of them have a tiny fraction of the national following, political aptitude and political talent that Trump has. And perhaps most importantly, neither of them are campaigning on issues that are important or popular with the primary electorates in the parties in which they are seeking the nomination. Which should tell you right there that both are going nowhere.