I don't understand your question. Of course individual judges have their biases and make mistakes. Your odds are better before one judge than before another. Which is a major reason that the appeals process is important. Even then, no system of human beings is perfect.GaryK wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2023 7:50 amInteresting that you seem to be admitting here that the American justice system has biased judges in its system. Or is it only those judges who have been appointed by Republican presidents that have this problem?Bootstrap wrote: ↑Fri Dec 01, 2023 7:08 am Trump has a very Trump-friendly judge in this case, he can try to make that argument in court and exclude the evidence. I doubt he would succeed. Regardless, I think that judge is unlikely to act quickly on this case. If Trump is re-eleected, I bet he will pardon himself for all federal crimes.
Judge Aileen Canon has already been rebuked fairly clearly by the 11th Circuit for a prior decision:
Here's their decision:The law is clear. We cannot write a rule that allows any subject of a search warrant to block government investigations after the execution of the warrant. Nor can we write a rule that allows only former presidents to do so.
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/ ... -12-01.pdf
The same Judge Aileen Canon is now in charge of the Mar-a-lago case. She chose not to recuse herself, despite the earlier rebuke. And she doesn't have to.