RZehr wrote: ↑Thu Aug 19, 2021 6:16 pmOur state has very recently again mandated masks inside public buildings. I have not learned exactly how churches fall on that mandate but I have a hunch they are not exempt. I also have a hunch that if churches are required to mask at the moment, that mandate will continue to be ignored.
Any concern I have is simply that it does go against the way I’ve been taught, to completely disregard what the governor is mandating. Having said that, I myself do not intend to mask either, because I have been told that “for sake of unity” it is better to follow suit and not mask for church. And of course the flesh side of me is more than happy not to mask.
My own personal journey was feeling like my own congregation was taking a bit many liberties in not wearing masks when we had all agreed we would do so, and some of our members were taking liberties against our state's emergency order. I shared my concerns with a few people and then just sat it out.
Later on, I felt ongoing masking wasn't a good idea, but our congregation had not yet reached a consensus (80% or so vote) to stop masking. So I kept doing it at church. I didn't feel a need to do it anywhere else, so literally the only place I wore a facemask consistently was at church, out of respect for the brethren's decision and the leadership's decision to keep doing so.
The unity I felt with that seemed a lot more important than getting my own way.
Any concern I have is simply that it does go against the way I’ve been taught, to completely disregard what the governor is mandating.
This is a quite difficult concern, and not one that I think is good for people to go off and just decide to disregard the law individually. But it does seem that the church, and a local congregation, has more authority vested in it from God than from worldly governments, and does have the authority to decide how to conduct its own health affairs. I feel content with that, as the church will be around much longer than any governor, state, or nation will be.