Not-so-United Methodists

Events occurring and how they relate/affect Anabaptist faith and culture.
Post Reply
User avatar
ohio jones
Posts: 5305
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:23 pm
Location: undisclosed
Affiliation: Rosedale Network

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by ohio jones »

Josh wrote:The latest news in Methodist politics is that the liberals are - surprise! - making plans to leave the United Methodist denomination now that they didn't get their way at the last General Conference. (This, after their impassioned pleas about how important unity and staying together is.)
It appears the new denomination will be the traditionalist one, but it may be a relatively organized and peaceful separation.
United Methodist Traditionalists, Centrists, Progressives & Bishops sign agreement aimed at separation
0 x
I grew up around Indiana, You grew up around Galilee; And if I ever really do grow up, I wanna grow up to be just like You -- Rich Mullins

I am a Christian and my name is Pilgram; I'm on a journey, but I'm not alone -- NewSong, slightly edited
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 24202
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by Josh »

ohio jones wrote:
Josh wrote:The latest news in Methodist politics is that the liberals are - surprise! - making plans to leave the United Methodist denomination now that they didn't get their way at the last General Conference. (This, after their impassioned pleas about how important unity and staying together is.)
It appears the new denomination will be the traditionalist one, but it may be a relatively organized and peaceful separation.
United Methodist Traditionalists, Centrists, Progressives & Bishops sign agreement aimed at separation
Somehow, I doubt the traditionalists will agree to give up their buildings, the Methodist name, and other ridiculous things required by this agreement, when the next General Conference meets.
0 x
User avatar
JimFoxvog
Posts: 2897
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:56 pm
Location: Northern Illinois
Affiliation: MCUSA

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by JimFoxvog »

Josh wrote:
Somehow, I doubt the traditionalists will agree to give up their buildings, the Methodist name, and other ridiculous things required by this agreement, when the next General Conference meets.
I think this means the churches that choose to be part of the new traditionalist Methodist denomination will not need to give up their buildings.
Frequently Asked Questions wrote:What happens to the property, assets, and liabilities of local churches or conferences which choose to affiliate with a new Methodist denomination pursuant to the Protocol?
A local church that affiliates with a Methodist denomination pursuant to the Protocol other than the post-separation United Methodist Church retains its assets and liabilities. The Annual Conference to which the local church belongs at the time of its separation will not exercise its trust clause and shall release such a local church from the provisions of any and all trust clauses. https://www.unitedmethodistbishops.org/ ... m-13133711
0 x
User avatar
ohio jones
Posts: 5305
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:23 pm
Location: undisclosed
Affiliation: Rosedale Network

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by ohio jones »

Josh wrote:Somehow, I doubt the traditionalists will agree to give up their buildings, the Methodist name, and other ridiculous things required by this agreement, when the next General Conference meets.
They get to keep the buildings and the Methodist name, according to pages 4 and 2 of the Protocol. They only lose the property if they don't remain Methodist, or if they close. Pensions too, apparently, though the language is more obscure. What the UMC does keep are the "general boards and agencies." There may indeed be some ridiculous requirements, but they aren't immediately apparent from the document.
0 x
I grew up around Indiana, You grew up around Galilee; And if I ever really do grow up, I wanna grow up to be just like You -- Rich Mullins

I am a Christian and my name is Pilgram; I'm on a journey, but I'm not alone -- NewSong, slightly edited
HondurasKeiser
Posts: 1746
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: La Ceiba, Honduras
Affiliation: LMC & IEMH

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by HondurasKeiser »

ohio jones wrote:
Josh wrote:Somehow, I doubt the traditionalists will agree to give up their buildings, the Methodist name, and other ridiculous things required by this agreement, when the next General Conference meets.
They get to keep the buildings and the Methodist name, according to pages 4 and 2 of the Protocol. They only lose the property if they don't remain Methodist, or if they close. Pensions too, apparently, though the language is more obscure. What the UMC does keep are the "general boards and agencies." There may indeed be some ridiculous requirements, but they aren't immediately apparent from the document.
It might be a blessing in disguise that they have to let go of the boards and agencies.
0 x
Affiliation: Lancaster Mennonite Conference & Honduran Mennonite Evangelical Church
temporal1
Posts: 16441
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:09 pm
Location: U.S. midwest and PNW
Affiliation: Christian other

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by temporal1 »

Growing pains, or spiritual suicide? :? :-|

Grand Forks Herald
“Best path to a younger flock? Church asks older members to worship elsewhere”
https://www.grandforksherald.com/lifest ... -elsewhere
Here's how one woke, inclusive United Methodist Church seeks to evangelize the world:
1. Hire a 30-year-old specialist "in starting new churches,"
2. Get rid of the old people,
3. Make the old people stay away for "15-18 months,"
4. Make any exiled old people "connect" with Specialist Jeremy Peters before "migrating back" about "how to best make that transition," and
5. During their period of exile, the hidden old people should continue "to mow the lawn ... shovel the snow" and "give money" to the church that is exiling them.

Sounds like a plan to me.
In with "affirming" homosexuals and cross-sex impersonators; out with old people.

On the church website, it says this:

"A welcome we really mean. Come as you are — you’ll be welcomed.
We strive to reflect God’s love to all. Be who you are — you’ll be celebrated. We honor the sacred worth and dignity of persons of every age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity ..."

(Not to worry, folks, Specialist Peters says the exiled old ones "will not be physically barred from attending." Phew.)

#NotYourGrandpasMinnesota #NotJesusChurch
#5 is bound for glory. :lol:


The Blaze
“Minnesota church aims to attract younger members by asking the older ones to stay away:
‘You are kicking us out of our church' “
https://www.theblaze.com/news/church-ai ... -stay-away
0 x
Most or all of this drama, humiliation, wasted taxpayer money could be spared -
with even modest attempt at presenting balanced facts from the start.


”We’re all just walking each other home.”
UNKNOWN
User avatar
Dan Z
Posts: 2654
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:20 am
Location: Central Minnesota
Affiliation: Conservative Menno

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by Dan Z »

This has gotten a lot of attention here in MN, and this "kicking out the old people" narrative may not be entirely accurate.Here is a letter to the congregation from the pastor.

Also, here's a statement from the UMC conference leadership in Minnesota:
Every time a new church is planted or an existing congregation is re-started, the effort is grounded in prayer, discernment, and sustained and collaborative conversation with the churches in that mission field, as was the case for The Grove. Cottage Grove was identified as a high-growth area that was underserved. We entered into conversations with the Grove, and the strategy deemed most effective to reach this community was to stop the current Cottage Grove worship service and refresh the building, worship, and programming in order to better reach the community. In many cases, reaching new people requires starting something entirely new, and an intentional re-start of a campus or church is a strategy that has been proven to work. The leadership team of The Grove affirmed this approach. As the pastoral letter indicates, this action has implications for those who call the Cottage Grove campus home, and the leadership team of The Grove has been walking with care alongside those folks.
Some of this is likely a result of the centralized polity of the United Methodist Church - it is a more hierarchical structure, with a Bishop as spiritual head and ultimate decision-maker, and assets and strategy for church growth held in good part at the regional level rather than primarily at the congregational level - although I'm sure it is ideal if it is as cooperative as possible. Thus, a small group of congregants in an aging and dying church may feel disempowered regarding the future of their beloved congregation. It's also quite possible the local leadership didn't do a good enough job of bringing them onboard with the new vision for the church - or perhaps this vision was just incompatible with what they would have wished for.

Anyway - more nuanced than The Blaze reported - but then again, nuance doesn't sell copy.
0 x
Ken
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by Ken »

Here's a news article by the Slate Religion reporter who interviewed the pastors involved.

https://slate.com/human-interest/2020/0 ... mbers.html
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
temporal1
Posts: 16441
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:09 pm
Location: U.S. midwest and PNW
Affiliation: Christian other

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by temporal1 »

Page 2:
HondurasKeiser wrote:A reminder to be in prayer for the upcoming United Methodist General Conference in February.

My uncle is a pastor in the UMC in Southwestern PA; at Christmastime there were hushed and consternated conversations between some of the aunts and uncles about which way the Conference would go: One Church Plan or Traditional Plan.

I know must of us have few if any ties to the UMC and so it may seem inconsequential to us.

I suggest though that the UMC, as the last of the Mainline Churches to hold out on full-inclusion of LGBTQ+ congregants, still has real cultural clout in certain regions of the country.

If yet another institution is knocked over by the steamroller of LGBTQ+ celebration, the ripple effects will definitely be felt.

The Institute on Religion & Democracy has been tirelessly covering the lead-up to Conference.

If you want some eye-opening insight into the stratagems of the LGBTQ+ lobby and how it has been so effortlessly deployed in institutions as disparate as the APA, New York Times, MCUSA, MCC, EMU & the New York City Penal Code; read the following
article
and be sure to click the attendant links.
My principle interest in the Methodist church situation is reading HK’s insights.
i have no plans to attend or join a Methodist church, altho, i’m sorry to say that.

No matter what pretty, PC, diplomatic words are chosen, the bottom line is as HK describes, and, they aren’t playing games. The public statement is something, but, bottom line, it doesn’t conflict with what the now sadly alienated older members are experiencing.

In the last 10 years or so, there has been plenty of chatter about, “We just have to wait for the old people to die” .. it’s not uncommon to hear this kind of thing from those in responsible positions, even in political office. Evidently, some are tired of waiting.

This pastor has $250,000 and a young appointee whose only goal, by their own words, is to remake the church into their preferred vision. They throw in various Bible-speak words to legitimize it.

i have witnessed in my life, older people who were active, vital, contributing members of churches become alienated and pushed aside. it’s not unusual for them to say, “i don’t know anyone at my church anymore.” this happens without formal plans to discontinue services, or large grants to overhaul churches.

what goes around comes around.
for these investing all they have into their new visions, they will one day be the older ones being pushed aside. possibly worse, when younger people witness elders treated this way, altho convenient for them in the moment, they may be unlikely to invest themselves as they might have wanted to ..
witnessing “home” churches become obsolete, like everything else in their disposable worlds.

(i believe) serious disruptions began in the 1990’s, with women in ministry, and normalizing everything homosexual. others may know better. since, MANY have felt, “i did not leave my church, my church left me.” i am one. when the investment is great, there may not be any getting over it. many live with a lot of sadness. there is plenty of it on this forum.

it might have been more dignified for all to let the small church die a natural death, the others could have started what they wanted without traumatizing this small group.

“a death is easier than a divorce.” :-|
Lead Pastor Wetterstrom wrote:
.. “This project is rooted in our mission to make disciples of Jesus Christ for transformation of [to] the world.” .. ..
i would change that one preposition.
Slate Religion:
.. This suggestion that members delay their return to the church by up to 18 months was the main source of the controversy.
“It was a bolt from the blue, handed down from on high and very shocking to the current members,” said Jim Baker, 82, who founded the church in 1989 and now attends as a member.

“The congregation was eager and totally open to a new approach, and particularly to [the idea of]
a new minister [being] appointed or to start[ing] a renewal process. But they really wanted to be included in that.”

(Wetterstrom insisted that the timeline is a suggestion, and that no one will be turned away.) ..
When people are in their 80’s and 90’s, they do not take for granted they will live or be as well functioning 15-18 months down the road, neither are they certain about their friends’ needs and lives. life is precarious.

as well, is there any scriptural basis to stop+restart a church group in this “Methodist way to congregational bliss?” if so, i’m foggy on it. it does sound “methodical.” :shock:
0 x
Most or all of this drama, humiliation, wasted taxpayer money could be spared -
with even modest attempt at presenting balanced facts from the start.


”We’re all just walking each other home.”
UNKNOWN
temporal1
Posts: 16441
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:09 pm
Location: U.S. midwest and PNW
Affiliation: Christian other

Re: Not-so-United Methodists

Post by temporal1 »

There are many write-ups on this now.
i won’t attempt to read all.

For me, HK is my most credible source, with insights-opinions on it. :)

“Cottage Grove church to usher out gray-haired members in effort to attract more young parishioners”
https://www.twincities.com/2020/01/18/c ... ishioners/
.. The Cottage Grove church struggled with membership and finances.
Seven years ago, Methodist officials said they could no longer pay for a minister for the church.

That’s when the Cottage Grove church switched to lay ministry, with weekly sermons by members of the church. The decision was made by two leadership teams within the two-church organization.

“This created a lot of independence. We kept it going,” said church founder Baker.
:arrow: That’s why the members are so fiercely loyal, he said.

Recently, the church’s attendance and finances have stabilized, with an average of 25 people worshiping weekly. .. ..
.. He said that Methodists’ regional Annual Conference is paying $250,000 to restart the church. They have hired a specialist in starting new churches — Jeremy Peters.

Peters, 32, has moved to Cottage Grove with his wife and three children. He is working with community groups, laying the groundwork for the relaunch, probably in November.

“It’s a new thing with a new mission for a new target,” said Peters, “and a new culture.”

:arrow: The older members will not be physically barred from attending, but the expectation is that they will not.
“We are asking them to let this happen,” said Wetterstrom.
“For this to be truly new, we can’t have the core group of 30 people. :shock:

“The members of the church have other options. They can come to Woodbury during this phase.”

How long should they stay away?
Wetterstrom’s timetable for the transition explains: “15-18 months after weekly worship is launched at Cottage Grove campus — those members of the current campus who are interested in migrating back … connect with (Peters) about how to best make that transition.” :-|

Church leadership has suggested the present-day members
:arrow: could be welcome
:arrow: if they supported the youthful new identity of the church. “If they are on board with that, they are welcome to attend and engage,” said Peters. :-|

The plan was communicated to all church members.

But not all of those members feel welcome. .. ..
There are several points in this article.
One is emphasizing age discrimination, i’m not seeing it.

What is evident is a serious, “My way or the highway,” demand put on the founding, or, core, group. The pastor is trying his best to smooth it over, but, not all wrinkles iron out. :-|

The idea that this has become routine “process” for Methodist “renewal” is not comforting.
It smacks of a (nonviolent) insurrection. :-|
“Just give us everything we want, no one gets hurt.” :-|

It’s sad, there are lots of Methodist churches in the world. Most have quite inviting buildings.
For many, flying rainbow flags on churches is a deal breaker. Not the only one, tho.
0 x
Most or all of this drama, humiliation, wasted taxpayer money could be spared -
with even modest attempt at presenting balanced facts from the start.


”We’re all just walking each other home.”
UNKNOWN
Post Reply