Josh wrote:It’s apparent government can’t really do anything without a ton of people not liking it.
In this case, giving food away to hungry people attracts criticism.
Right. I thought the following quote from CNN.com was particularly ironic.
"It's a risky scheme that threatens families' ability to put food on the table," said Stacy Dean, vice president for food assistance policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
0 x
Remember the prisoners, as though you were in prison with them, and the mistreated, as though you yourselves were suffering bodily. -Heb. 13:3
Josh wrote:It’s apparent government can’t really do anything without a ton of people not liking it.
In this case, giving food away to hungry people attracts criticism.
Is that anything new? I've heard criticism of SNAP and other programs to help poor people for years.
I don't know enough to really have an opinion on this program yet, you really do want to evaluate even well-meaning programs to make sure they are cost-effective, meet clearly thought-out goals, and tend to lead people in the direction of independence rather than dependency.
0 x
Is it biblical? Is it Christlike? Is it loving? Is it true? How can I find out?
Josh wrote:It’s apparent government can’t really do anything without a ton of people not liking it.
In this case, giving food away to hungry people attracts criticism.
Is that anything new? I've heard criticism of SNAP and other programs to help poor people for years.
I don't know enough to really have an opinion on this program yet, you really do want to evaluate even well-meaning programs to make sure they are cost-effective, meet clearly thought-out goals, and tend to lead people in the direction of independence rather than dependency.
That's why the politicians are paid the big bucks, right? I'll just go back to meekly selling lettuce, candy and pop to anybody who can pay in paper or plastic.
0 x
Remember the prisoners, as though you were in prison with them, and the mistreated, as though you yourselves were suffering bodily. -Heb. 13:3
Hats Off wrote:After a quick look at Mike's grocery lists, there are few items on them that we would buy. I would love to browse the store sometime and try a few of those "luxury" items.
In particular, the following are not likely to be on my shopping list:
Josh wrote:It’s apparent government can’t really do anything without a ton of people not liking it.
In this case, giving food away to hungry people attracts criticism.
True, but this is also a misrepresentation (by implication) of said criticisms and their possible validity.
Hats Off wrote:After a quick look at Mike's grocery lists, there are few items on them that we would buy. I would love to browse the store sometime and try a few of those "luxury" items.
In particular, the following are not likely to be on my shopping list:
Josh wrote:It’s apparent government can’t really do anything without a ton of people not liking it.
In this case, giving food away to hungry people attracts criticism.
Is that anything new? I've heard criticism of SNAP and other programs to help poor people for years.
I don't know enough to really have an opinion on this program yet, you really do want to evaluate even well-meaning programs to make sure they are cost-effective, meet clearly thought-out goals, and tend to lead people in the direction of independence rather than dependency.
I would trust that the smart people in the USDA and HHS will do this. Let’s just let government agencies do their jobs and ignore media and partisan hype.
Josh wrote:It’s apparent government can’t really do anything without a ton of people not liking it.
In this case, giving food away to hungry people attracts criticism.
Is that anything new? I've heard criticism of SNAP and other programs to help poor people for years.
I don't know enough to really have an opinion on this program yet, you really do want to evaluate even well-meaning programs to make sure they are cost-effective, meet clearly thought-out goals, and tend to lead people in the direction of independence rather than dependency.
I would trust that the smart people in the USDA and HHS will do this. Let’s just let government agencies do their jobs and ignore media and partisan hype.
Yep. Back to your day jobs, everybody.
0 x
Remember the prisoners, as though you were in prison with them, and the mistreated, as though you yourselves were suffering bodily. -Heb. 13:3
Wayne in Maine wrote:I expect people who currently abuse the current cash/ebt programs would not bother with these parcels. I doubt there would be much of a cash market for it.
If you grew up in one of our neighborhoods, you would see Cadillacs waiting down the street from a distribution center simply to purchase cheese from eligible recipients. As was mentioned earlier, there was an income requirement for participation in the program. I understand, however, that a number of wealthy people would also purchase surplus cheese illegally from eligible recipients and consume it along with caviar.
Wayne in Maine wrote:Ask Valerie how often she sees people buy fresh fruit and seeds with their SNAP benefits.
Probably never; I don't think her chain sells those things. But Mike's data will be interesting.
Valerie wrote:I remember one young lady who was dressed really nice & obviously had her hair done professionally, when her ebt card had a problem, she didn't want her pack of bottled water & said "I'm not going to pay for it out of 'my' money!"
Wait ... we pay the water bill for those in need (separate program, of course) AND pay for their bottled water?
Actually, Discount Drug Mart DOES carry fresh fruits, vegetables and pretty good quality - and seeds as well- tobe honest I usually don't pay close attention to this as I'm in a hurry to get them through the line-and out- I normally will only take note if THEY say something-
I was surprised bottled water was covered- yes- not sure why- there are less expensive options I believe- again if someone is really down and out and needs help, of course we all agree there should be charitable help- it's the what seems to be abuse-