Yes, that is what I meant...sort of. It's extremely important that all of this is in the context of a funeral that took place in November, not recently, and that RZehr said, "Pretty much everyone knew it was going to be a 'super spreader event' beforehand, and no precautions were taken." (I appreciate that RZehr clarified the situation, and I readily acknowledge that my statements before that clarification were based on poor information. I nonetheless stand by my responses in the context of RZehr's initial statement.) And in the context of what RZehr said, it wasn't something that *could* spread disease so much as it was something that *would* spread disease ("everyone knew it was going to be a 'super spreader event'").Josh wrote: ↑Thu Aug 19, 2021 6:07 pm I will try to understand your position above and not put words in your mouth; here is what you seem to be saying:
"It is mind-boggling to me that a normal funeral was held."
"I'm confounded that precautions weren't taken at that funeral."
"I am very disappointed and do not approve of people going ahead with a funeral that could spread something like the flu."
If that is not what you meant by your above words, please correct me.
Your responses addressed, among other things, the conservative Anabaptist view of lockdowns, the COVID situation of recent months, the consequences of more recent gatherings, the hypochondriac status of those who care about COVID or are afraid of conservative Anabaptist funerals, the prospect of permanent changes to church events, and combatting obesity as a greater priority than combatting COVID. None of which addressed what I had actually said in context, and much of which came after the first time I told you that you were missing my point (but before you asked for clarification).