The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

General Christian Theology
Ernie
Posts: 5545
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:48 pm
Location: Central PA
Affiliation: Anabaptist Umbrella
Contact:

The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by Ernie »

As I read the news the last 4 days, I wondered if it is ethical for Christian to join a run on the banks. First of all it helps the bank to collapse. Secondly, it is taking money ahead of others, knowing that by doing so, others may not get their money.

Seems like a Christian who does so, should be willing to share what money he withdrawls with those who didn't get any.

I understand that everyone as SVP is now supposed to get their money, but what about situations where not everyone gets some as often happens elsewhere and in the US past?
0 x
The old woodcutter spoke again. “It is impossible to talk with you. You always draw conclusions. Life is so vast, yet you judge all of life with one page or one word. You see only a fragment. Unless you know the whole story, how can you judge?"
RZehr
Posts: 7253
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:42 am
Affiliation: Cons. Mennonite

Re: The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by RZehr »

I would contribute if I feared total loss and thought I could get my money out. For sure. It’s not that different than a thousand other decisions one makes every day.
I wouldn’t wring my hands over it.

Would you buy a house in a rising market? Would you sell in a dropping market? Unless you refuse to do that, I suppose you are contributing to homelessness. Maybe one shouldn’t even live in a house, but rather let others have them, and thereby in some small token way, contribute to… well something virtuous.

Banks will collapse, and runs will happen regardless of what I do or don’t do.

This morning someone told me that his banks stock was ridiculously far down, and that trading had stopped. He wasn’t to worried since he had less that $2,000 in it.
Reality is, if it’s some insignificant amount at risk, people aren’t as likely to run on the bank. And if it’s under $250k, it’s supposed to be insured anyway.
2 x
Ken
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by Ken »

The bigger question is whether it is "Christian" to have more than $250,000 of cash sitting in some bank.

Even most wealthy people don't have that much cash sitting around. The maybe own a home, have some investments in their 401(k) or IRA, maybe have some investments in stocks or bonds (or more likely stock or bond mutual funds), etc. But few people have a quarter of a million dollars sitting around in cash in bank account.
2 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
MaxPC
Posts: 9120
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:09 pm
Location: Former full time RVers
Affiliation: PlainRomanCatholic
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by MaxPC »

I see the situation with the banks as a part of a larger concern over which God has not given me control. He is in charge of that, not I.

God has given me stewardship of those material things immediately under my control and He has entrusted me to use my brain to make use of those gifts as Jesus taught in the parable of the talents in Matthew 25.

As always YMMV.
0 x
Max (Plain Catholic)
Mt 24:35
Proverbs 18:2 A fool does not delight in understanding but only in revealing his own mind.
1 Corinthians 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is folly with God
Ernie
Posts: 5545
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:48 pm
Location: Central PA
Affiliation: Anabaptist Umbrella
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by Ernie »

RZehr wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 10:05 pmBanks will collapse, and runs will happen regardless of what I do or don’t do.
This metality that many people have about ecology, helping the poor, preaching the gospel to those who have not heard, etc. "Whatever I do is not going to really matter in the big scheme of things so I might as well..."
Rather than looking at the part they play or could play in it.
Last edited by Ernie on Mon Mar 13, 2023 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 x
The old woodcutter spoke again. “It is impossible to talk with you. You always draw conclusions. Life is so vast, yet you judge all of life with one page or one word. You see only a fragment. Unless you know the whole story, how can you judge?"
Ernie
Posts: 5545
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:48 pm
Location: Central PA
Affiliation: Anabaptist Umbrella
Contact:

Re: The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by Ernie »

Ken wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 10:27 pm The bigger question is whether it is "Christian" to have more than $250,000 of cash sitting in some bank.

Even most wealthy people don't have that much cash sitting around. The maybe own a home, have some investments in their 401(k) or IRA, maybe have some investments in stocks or bonds (or more likely stock or bond mutual funds), etc. But few people have a quarter of a million dollars sitting around in cash in bank account.
I don't have 250k sitting around but I do hope to buy a home for more than that at some point. So where should my money be put until I buy a home?
1 x
The old woodcutter spoke again. “It is impossible to talk with you. You always draw conclusions. Life is so vast, yet you judge all of life with one page or one word. You see only a fragment. Unless you know the whole story, how can you judge?"
Ken
Posts: 16239
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by Ken »

Ernie wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 11:15 pm
Ken wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 10:27 pm The bigger question is whether it is "Christian" to have more than $250,000 of cash sitting in some bank.

Even most wealthy people don't have that much cash sitting around. The maybe own a home, have some investments in their 401(k) or IRA, maybe have some investments in stocks or bonds (or more likely stock or bond mutual funds), etc. But few people have a quarter of a million dollars sitting around in cash in bank account.
I don't have 250k sitting around but I do hope to buy a home for more than that at some point. So where should my money be put until I buy a home?
You planning to buy a house for cash? A 20% down payment on a $500,000 home is just $100,000.

In any event, if you have that much cash and are saving to pay for a home in cash, put it in a CD then, or a couple of them. 12 month CDs are currently paying about 4.75%. And you can't cash out in a bank run anyway. So your $250,000 locked into a 12 month CD will earn $11,875.

The point of my comment is that only people with single accounts that are massively larger than $250,000 need even concern themselves with bank runs anyway. For the rest of us mortals it is not much of a concern. Our money is safe anyway.
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
RZehr
Posts: 7253
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:42 am
Affiliation: Cons. Mennonite

Re: The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by RZehr »

Ernie wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 11:13 pm
RZehr wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 10:05 pmBanks will collapse, and runs will happen regardless of what I do or don’t do.
This metality that many people have about ecology, helping the poor, preaching the gospel to those who have not heard, etc. "Whatever I do is not going to really matter in the big scheme of things so I might as well..."
Rather than looking at the part they play or could play in it.
I don’t think so. If it’s all about helping people, you are better equipped to help people with the cash you pull out, then you are just losing the cash.
Taking your own cash out of a failing bank, is not at all immoral, and leaving your cash in and losing it in a bank failure is not virtuous. I think this scenario is reaching too far into the ether, and trying to create a moral connection where there just isn’t one. Depositors have zero moral obligation to prop up failing banks. Banks have an obligation to keep the money safe, and give depositors back their money.

This is even different than buying toilet paper in a shortage. The money is already yours, the toilet paper is not.

Maybe being in business is unethical, because it is taking work from someone else; maybe having a job is unethical on similar grounds. Why do we work? For money. If it is ethical to work for money, it is also ethical to be paid the money. And it’s ethical to take money that is owed to you, whether from a job, or from where you’ve stored it in a bank.

If a customer is going bankrupt, but you are one of the last ones to be paid in full before he files, there is nothing wrong with being paid what was owed to you. You have no ethical obligation to refuse payment, and try to help the other creditors. You can if you want to. But there’s not an obligation to do so.
1 x
User avatar
ohio jones
Posts: 5305
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:23 pm
Location: undisclosed
Affiliation: Rosedale Network

Re: The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by ohio jones »

Ken wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 11:36 pm You planning to buy a house for cash?
Living within one's means is a good thing. More people should try it.
6 x
I grew up around Indiana, You grew up around Galilee; And if I ever really do grow up, I wanna grow up to be just like You -- Rich Mullins

I am a Christian and my name is Pilgram; I'm on a journey, but I'm not alone -- NewSong, slightly edited
temporal1
Posts: 16441
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:09 pm
Location: U.S. midwest and PNW
Affiliation: Christian other

Re: The Ethics of contributing to a Run on the Banks

Post by temporal1 »

ohio jones wrote: Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:48 am Living within one's means is a good thing. More people should try it.
There are many more who could (easily) do this, if only they would.
Madison Avenue is an effective siren.
1 x
Most or all of this drama, humiliation, wasted taxpayer money could be spared -
with even modest attempt at presenting balanced facts from the start.


”We’re all just walking each other home.”
UNKNOWN
Post Reply