Bootstrap wrote:gcdonner wrote:
Well, if someone had real evidence one way or another, at least one of us would be surprised. Until then, your guess is as good as mine.
As one who loves to study and watch other cultures, I do find this in many and I can not think of a major culture that does not use it. I am sure there may be a few minor cultures that do/did not use it. I suspect they would be the exception, not the rule.
Fro Gilgamesh and Beowulf forward, we have found hyberbole. Most stories carry it as a tool. Before most cultures were literate, they had to memorize things. Hyberbole and many other structural tools were used to aid in this. Here is an example.
I walked into the woods and a branch bumped me in the head.
Who will really remember that?
Walking into the dark foreboding forest, I turned and was struck by a branch that appeared out of nowhere, as if some unseen hand wielded it to gain my attention.
The hyberbole is a tool to gain attention and visualize an experience. Once visualized, it aids in memorization. Oral cultures use many story telling tools to pass on the morals, principles, and culture to others. Both sentences are true, but one is memorable while the other is not. One would be retold while the other is not.
I was once told that one theory about the NT was the stories we have were the ones worth dying for. We do not hear about Jesus waking up, getting breakfast, cleaning he clothes and washing his face. Reason is they were not worth dying for, since multiple times in the early church history, persecution drove the narrative. Why pass on a story not worth telling if you would die from it? Pass on the important things. It also forced the tellers to craft it in a way that it could b remembered orally and it passed something important to the hearer. I would not want to die telling someone about Jesus waking up to do mundane things. I would be willing to tell the story of his death and resurrection though. This does not make the story wrong or untrue, but told in a way that, one would impart memorization, and two would pass on a deeper meaning. We have to remember that all scripture, new and old, were carried orally for a time, some hundreds of years, before getting written down. They had to be told in a way that it would be remembered. They did not have the luxury of going back and reading it again.