I don't think Jesus was a contemporary person. Not a contemporary rock star, not a contemporary plan Anabaptist, not a contemporary Catholic or Protestant, certainly not a contemporary white American.karpos wrote:ive heard this argument to support "christian rock" and Jesus was this very contemporary person and would dress like a rock musician in order to reach people that listened to rock music, had long hair and body piercings...I dont buy it.Bootstrap wrote:I don't know. Jesus hung out with a whole lot of people that fine religious people could not tolerate - some of them were sinners whom he came to redeem, some of them simply did not fit into the self-righteous religious boxes that the Pharisees liked.
But I do think that New Testament Christianity was mostly about the things that the New Testament is about. If the Bible is the core and we read it in light of what Jesus said and did, then the things that are central in his life should be central in ours.
I haven't seen a solid argument that tattoos are one of these things. To me, this feels like really strong judgment about something peripheral at best to New Testament teaching. If you can teach me to understand the Bible better on this front, please do.