Paul and Barnabas

Christian ethics and theology with an Anabaptist perspective
temporal1
Posts: 16279
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:09 pm
Location: U.S. midwest and PNW
Affiliation: Christian other

Paul and Barnabas

Post by temporal1 »

i'm wondering about the conservative Anabaptist view of Paul and Barnabas' division?
one reference:
https://www.christiancourier.com/articl ... rnabas-the

i was thinking of them in Wayne's thread, Page 6:
Are Plain Catholics Anabaptists?
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php ... 5&start=50

if any interest, looking forward to replies. :)
0 x
Most or all of this drama, humiliation, wasted taxpayer money could be spared -
with even modest attempt at presenting balanced facts from the start.


”We’re all just walking each other home.”
UNKNOWN
User avatar
Wayne in Maine
Posts: 1195
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 5:52 am
Location: Slightly above sea level, in the dear old State of Maine
Affiliation: Yielded

Re: Paul and Barnabas

Post by Wayne in Maine »

temporal1 wrote:i'm wondering about the conservative Anabaptist view of Paul and Barnabas' division?
one reference:
https://www.christiancourier.com/articl ... rnabas-the

i was thinking of them in Wayne's thread, Page 6:
Are Plain Catholics Anabaptists?
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php ... 5&start=50

if any interest, looking forward to replies. :)
I have no idea how this is relevant to my post.
0 x
temporal1
Posts: 16279
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:09 pm
Location: U.S. midwest and PNW
Affiliation: Christian other

Re: Paul and Barnabas

Post by temporal1 »

Wayne in Maine wrote:
temporal1 wrote:i'm wondering about the conservative Anabaptist view of Paul and Barnabas' division?
one reference:
https://www.christiancourier.com/articl ... rnabas-the

i was thinking of them in Wayne's thread, Page 6:
Are Plain Catholics Anabaptists?
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php ... 5&start=50

if any interest, looking forward to replies. :)
I have no idea how this is relevant to my post.
i was thinking of my post, in my reply to you:
i wrote:
Paul and Barnabas had a hard time. it happens to "the best of us."
did not intend to confuse, did not want to distract.
this thread is definitely a new topic.
hope that helps.

in yet another thread, i was also thinking of some words from GaryK:
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php ... 0&start=10
GaryK wrote:
justme wrote:this is how i see it.
whether max's people are a figment of his imagination or not, is not the point anymore.

the point, as i see it, is that max was caught in what boot feels are falsehoods, and max hasn't acknowledged that. max continues to portray himself as the person with all the answers and boot doesn't want folks on mn to think that max is truthful.

i watched the attempt at reconciliation. it was one-sided. max refused to participate.
so for those of you who feel that max is trying to be nice by not corresponding with boot? i disagree. it's passive aggressive, and it's a power struggle between the two of them. let them fight it out to the bitter end, and hopefully they won't take anyone else down with them when they go out in flames.

my opinion.

Fighting it out to the bitter end doesn't seem very Christlike to me.
And this is in no way an endorsement of one party over the other.
Jesus had some pretty straight forward things to say about power struggles.
Last edited by temporal1 on Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 x
Most or all of this drama, humiliation, wasted taxpayer money could be spared -
with even modest attempt at presenting balanced facts from the start.


”We’re all just walking each other home.”
UNKNOWN
User avatar
ohio jones
Posts: 5222
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:23 pm
Location: undisclosed
Affiliation: Rosedale Network

Re: Paul and Barnabas

Post by ohio jones »

temporal1 wrote:i was thinking of them in Wayne's thread, Page 6:
Are Plain Catholics Anabaptists?
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php ... 5&start=50
To link to a specific post rather than a page, right click the thread name on that post and copy the link. In this case:
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=815&start=50#p20946

Might help to avoid confusion. :geek:
0 x
I grew up around Indiana, You grew up around Galilee; And if I ever really do grow up, I wanna grow up to be just like You -- Rich Mullins

I am a Christian and my name is Pilgram; I'm on a journey, but I'm not alone -- NewSong, slightly edited
temporal1
Posts: 16279
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:09 pm
Location: U.S. midwest and PNW
Affiliation: Christian other

Re: Paul and Barnabas

Post by temporal1 »

ohio jones wrote:
temporal1 wrote:i was thinking of them in Wayne's thread, Page 6:
Are Plain Catholics Anabaptists?
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php ... 5&start=50
To link to a specific post rather than a page, right click the thread name on that post and copy the link. In this case:
http://forum.mennonet.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=815&start=50#p20946

Might help to avoid confusion. :geek:
thank you.
while you are here .. i have never heard a CM speak to this conflict. would you be willing?
0 x
Most or all of this drama, humiliation, wasted taxpayer money could be spared -
with even modest attempt at presenting balanced facts from the start.


”We’re all just walking each other home.”
UNKNOWN
RZehr
Posts: 7027
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:42 am
Affiliation: Cons. Mennonite

Re: Paul and Barnabas

Post by RZehr »

Paul and Barnabus are not Jesus. We don't look to Paul as a perfect example of how to live. I look at this account as a simple acknowledgement of something that happened, and not necessarily as a teaching on the best way to resolve differences. I believe it is incorrect to somehow hold this up as a proof text to condone our inability to get along and work along.
But we are not perfect either and like Paul and Barnabus, we sometimes do the same thing for the same reasons. I see it as a less than perfect option for less than perfect people. It certainly is a better option than continuing to butt heads on issues. Just decide to peacefully and humbly - even strongly - disagree on an issue that is of secondary importance and part ways in order to give each other space to do what each believes best.

This is different than parting over issues of salvation.
0 x
MaxPC
Posts: 9044
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 9:09 pm
Location: Former full time RVers
Affiliation: PlainRomanCatholic
Contact:

Re: Paul and Barnabas

Post by MaxPC »

RZehr wrote:Paul and Barnabus are not Jesus. We don't look to Paul as a perfect example of how to live. I look at this account as a simple acknowledgement of something that happened, and not necessarily as a teaching on the best way to resolve differences. I believe it is incorrect to somehow hold this up as a proof text to condone our inability to get along and work along.
But we are not perfect either and like Paul and Barnabus, we sometimes do the same thing for the same reasons. I see it as a less than perfect option for less than perfect people. It certainly is a better option than continuing to butt heads on issues. Just decide to peacefully and humbly - even strongly - disagree on an issue that is of secondary importance and part ways in order to give each other space to do what each believes best.

This is different than parting over issues of salvation.
Spot on. Well said. :up:
0 x
Max (Plain Catholic)
Mt 24:35
Proverbs 18:2 A fool does not delight in understanding but only in revealing his own mind.
1 Corinthians 3:19 For the wisdom of this world is folly with God
User avatar
Bootstrap
Posts: 14445
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 9:59 am
Affiliation: Mennonite

Re: Paul and Barnabas

Post by Bootstrap »

RZehr wrote:Paul and Barnabus are not Jesus. We don't look to Paul as a perfect example of how to live. I look at this account as a simple acknowledgement of something that happened, and not necessarily as a teaching on the best way to resolve differences. I believe it is incorrect to somehow hold this up as a proof text to condone our inability to get along and work along.

But we are not perfect either and like Paul and Barnabus, we sometimes do the same thing for the same reasons. I see it as a less than perfect option for less than perfect people. It certainly is a better option than continuing to butt heads on issues. Just decide to peacefully and humbly - even strongly - disagree on an issue that is of secondary importance and part ways in order to give each other space to do what each believes best.

This is different than parting over issues of salvation.
Here is the text.
Acts 15:36-41 (ESV) wrote:And after some days Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us return and visit the brothers in every city where we proclaimed the word of the Lord, and see how they are.” Now Barnabas wanted to take with them John called Mark. But Paul thought best not to take with them one who had withdrawn from them in Pamphylia and had not gone with them to the work. And there arose a sharp disagreement, so that they separated from each other. Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed away to Cyprus, but Paul chose Silas and departed, having been commended by the brothers to the grace of the Lord. And he went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.
What lessons would you draw from that, and how would you apply them?

What did it look like to "part ways"?
0 x
Is it biblical? Is it Christlike? Is it loving? Is it true? How can I find out?
lesterb
Posts: 1160
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Alberta
Affiliation: Western Fellowship
Contact:

Re: Paul and Barnabas

Post by lesterb »

What sticks out to me is that the church didn't divide over the issue. In modern times most often an issue like that becomes a congregational issue.
0 x
ken_sylvania
Posts: 3971
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:46 pm
Affiliation: CM

Re: Paul and Barnabas

Post by ken_sylvania »

Bootstrap wrote:
RZehr wrote:Paul and Barnabus are not Jesus. We don't look to Paul as a perfect example of how to live. I look at this account as a simple acknowledgement of something that happened, and not necessarily as a teaching on the best way to resolve differences. I believe it is incorrect to somehow hold this up as a proof text to condone our inability to get along and work along.

But we are not perfect either and like Paul and Barnabus, we sometimes do the same thing for the same reasons. I see it as a less than perfect option for less than perfect people. It certainly is a better option than continuing to butt heads on issues. Just decide to peacefully and humbly - even strongly - disagree on an issue that is of secondary importance and part ways in order to give each other space to do what each believes best.

This is different than parting over issues of salvation.
Here is the text.
Acts 15:36-41 (ESV) wrote:And after some days Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us return and visit the brothers in every city where we proclaimed the word of the Lord, and see how they are.” Now Barnabas wanted to take with them John called Mark. But Paul thought best not to take with them one who had withdrawn from them in Pamphylia and had not gone with them to the work. And there arose a sharp disagreement, so that they separated from each other. Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed away to Cyprus, but Paul chose Silas and departed, having been commended by the brothers to the grace of the Lord. And he went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches.
What lessons would you draw from that, and how would you apply them?

What did it look like to "part ways"?
I wonder if it would have been wise for Paul and Barnabas to allow the church some input into their decision here. Paul and Barnabas were initially sent out by the church, but it almost seems like this second trip was being arranged more on their own.
After Barnabas and John Mark leave, then we have Paul and Silas being sent off by the church on their journey.

What blesses me the most about this account is actually the follow-up found in 2 Tim 4:11, where Paul instructs Timothy to bring Mark along, as someone who would be helpful to him in the ministry. This suggests that Paul was able to see beyond this disagreement (even though it caused him and Barnabas to part ways for a time) and recognize this young brother's potential.
0 x
Post Reply