Ernie wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 11:33 am
As far as I know all Plain Anabaptists allow for divorce and remarrying in certain situations. They just draw the lines at different places. By keeping it somewhat vague, it applies to all those who do not allow it in at least some circumstances.
Now I find myself really confused. The Swiss Brethren position I'm familiar with is the one informed by the Amish background of some SB folks, so I realize that is not the whole deal, not totally representative. My understanding of their position is that as long as the first spouse (or, in the case of an earlier widowhood or 'widowerhood', as the case may be, an earlier spouse after all previous spouses have died) is the only valid married partner. So then, there can be no divorce from any other person, because any such 'civil union' entered into is "not a real marriage". By definition, a divorce requires a valid marriage. So they advocate separation from all such unions, because all such relationships are adulterous ones, not marriages. And then, if at all possible, a return to the "real spouse". If that person is unwilling, then a separated, single life is the only recourse. If that spouse is willing to return to the married relationship, then that isn't "remarriage", but rather a restoration of the only marriage in which either person is engaged.
I am, as were my forefathers, always in favor of restoration of marriage relationships. The so-called "exception clause" should only be applied in the most clear cases. However, I freely confess to some contrary thoughts, because who can know that the adulterous spouse will not, at some future point, repent, and return. Only unrepentant till death can provide the final assurance that there will be no repentance. The answer given (as I understand it), is that the persistent and unrepentant adultery has terminated the marriage union, and the divorce proceeding is just a recognition of this (and of course also a legal step in modern societies). While celibacy is not an easy life, married life is not a "guaranteed right" in Scripture. Marriage should not be entered into lightly, and certainly should not be terminated lightly.
As far as my own misgivings go (concerning the exception clause), I think that it is possible that the meaning of the text is that the innocent party is free from the responsibility for the broken marriage relationship, but possibly this freedom does not include remarriage. God often uses the marriage relationship as a picture of His own relationship with His people, and so to sully that symbolism is taken very seriously.
Congregation: Gospel Haven Mennonite Fellowship, Benton, Ohio (Holmes Co.) a split from Beachy-Amish Mennonite.
Personal heritage & general theological viewpoint: conservative Mennonite Brethren.