I appreciate your perspective and I want to clarify that I dont disagree there is a very obvious fact the Kingdom has a present day aspect to a Christian. In otherwards, I dont think the Kingdom topic is ONLY future. My point is what both Ro 14:17 and John 3 are stating. The Kingdom we receive today is "...in the Holy Ghost" not in myself. Or as John says it in chapter 3 we enter the Kingdom by the new birth which is baptism by the Holy Spirit. What I'm advocating for is the recognition that the Kingdom aspect we have in the flesh is only through our connection to the Lord via the Holy Spirit. This indwelling of the Spirit is the mechanism that moves us from the Kingdom of darkness to the Kingdom of light. The Spirit is what preserves us for the Kingdom thats to come in its fulness upon our Lords return...NedFlanders wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2023 2:56 pm Thanks for that Nomad.
I think it’s good to temper our thoughts on how the Old and New, as well as what the kingdom of God does in our lives now rather than waiting for its full coming with this verse:
And also notice the present tense:Romans 14:17 For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost.These are just a few verses that lead me to the place that I don’t think the New Testament authors would have agreed with you that what the Old Testament kingdom used to be was supposed to not change.Colossians 1:13 Who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son:
Also remember John 3 in Christ talking about being born again is about seeing and entering the kingdom - with that is the mention of the Homy Spirit in a way that no one sees it come and go.
Maybe you’ve been taught a kingdom of God that was much about works?
2 Timothy 4:18
[18]And the Lord shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his heavenly kingdom: to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen. (2Tim 4:1 attaches the Kingdom to the Lords appearing also. Which is a reference to His coming again I believe).
What I'm advocating for isn't the removal of the fruit that a believer is to be producing in the Christian walk. That is one of our purposes for sure. What I'm advocating for is that we stress the being grounded in the root who supplies the nutrients for the fruit we produce...rather than just stressing the fruit produced. In the same manner I believe that's how we should view the Kingdom. The way we are grounded in His Kingdom is by His Holy Spirit which is our sole link to our King...not by the amount of fruit I'm producing. To me, this removes any boasting we might lean on in our own flesh as being the production of what drives the Kingdom. What drives the Kingdom is the King...not me or the performance of the church in this age. My main issue is when the Kingdom is presented in a way where its dependent on ME to expand the Kingdom. I'm not saying everyone believes that way or teaches that way...I've just heard it in hints through some of the Kingdom teachings I've listened to through the years.
I personally can't bring myself to believe that the Kingdom is now just a spiritual type that is detached from the Old Testament presentation. Why would God do that? Why would He present it in such a visual, physical and spiritual way...only to say that its transformed into a Kingdom in our hearts? Yes in a sense its in our hearts from the indwelling of the Holy Spirit who connects us to Jesus. but the culmination of the Kingdom will be when our King returns. As wonderful as some Christians are...it would be a let down if what we see from ourselves or the Church around us as the fulfillment of the Kingdom.
I am more than willing to admit that my view could possibly be tainted from my previous experiences. I suppose for someone who didn't grow up in my setting...they probably have a completely different perspective...and probably rightfully so.