Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Christian ethics and theology with an Anabaptist perspective

Non-resistance: Which best represents the limits of your non-resistant convictions?

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
Josh
Posts: 23806
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by Josh »

ken_sylvania wrote:I'm not sure exactly when he was converted either, but I would suggest it may have been either when he met Jesus on the shore of Lake Gennesaret after Jesus' resurrection or when he received the Holy Spirit. According to Jesus statement at the last supper (I have prayed for thee ... when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.), Peter's was not yet converted at that time, even though he knew and believed that Jesus was the Messiah.
How biblical is the concept of conversion at an exact moment in time?

The New Testament talks a lot about walking in the light, following Jesus, picking up your cross, etc., but talks very little about the need to be converted and that there is pre-conversion and post-conversion. Instead, being a "convert" seems to be an ongoing thing.
0 x
ken_sylvania
Posts: 3969
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 12:46 pm
Affiliation: CM

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by ken_sylvania »

Josh wrote: How biblical is the concept of conversion at an exact moment in time?

The New Testament talks a lot about walking in the light, following Jesus, picking up your cross, etc., but talks very little about the need to be converted and that there is pre-conversion and post-conversion. Instead, being a "convert" seems to be an ongoing thing.
I think the old-order concept of conversion as more of a gradual thing which consists of becoming more like Christ in our thoughts and actions is valid. "Crisis Conversions" are more of a Protestant innovation.
0 x
User avatar
Dan Z
Posts: 2648
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:20 am
Location: Central Minnesota
Affiliation: Conservative Menno

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by Dan Z »

Josh wrote:
ken_sylvania wrote:I'm not sure exactly when he was converted either, but I would suggest it may have been either when he met Jesus on the shore of Lake Gennesaret after Jesus' resurrection or when he received the Holy Spirit. According to Jesus statement at the last supper (I have prayed for thee ... when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.), Peter's was not yet converted at that time, even though he knew and believed that Jesus was the Messiah.
How biblical is the concept of conversion at an exact moment in time?

The New Testament talks a lot about walking in the light, following Jesus, picking up your cross, etc., but talks very little about the need to be converted and that there is pre-conversion and post-conversion. Instead, being a "convert" seems to be an ongoing thing.
...little rabbit in the woods... :)
0 x
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 23806
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by Josh »

If a crisis conversion is not actually a biblical concept, it's going to be very difficult to figure out exactly when Peter was converted.

I would argue that he was born a Jew, grew up following God's Law as ordained for the Israelites, and then he also started following Jesus, and was part of the transition from solely following the old law to becoming Jesus-followers.
0 x
User avatar
Dan Z
Posts: 2648
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:20 am
Location: Central Minnesota
Affiliation: Conservative Menno

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by Dan Z »

...little man by the window stood...
0 x
RZehr
Posts: 7024
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 12:42 am
Affiliation: Cons. Mennonite

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by RZehr »

For some reason I keep thinking of "..when they persecute you in one city, flee to the next..." I also think of Dirk fleeing his captures. I know these accounts are not directly addressing personal attacks in they way the NRA has been teaching Americans to fear, but I do think fleeing is a proven and safe course of action and much preferred over defending oneself.
0 x
User avatar
Dan Z
Posts: 2648
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:20 am
Location: Central Minnesota
Affiliation: Conservative Menno

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by Dan Z »

RZehr wrote:For some reason I keep thinking of "..when they persecute you in one city, flee to the next..." I also think of Dirk fleeing his captures. I know these accounts are not directly addressing personal attacks in they way the NRA has been teaching Americans to fear, but I do think fleeing is a proven and safe course of action and much preferred over defending oneself.
I agree. I think we who are non-resistant need to think this stuff through ahead of time, and have at our disposal a variety of ways of responding to threat or attack that do not violate our commitment to nonresistance - fleeing, random kindness, a gentle answer, self-sacrifice, etc.
0 x
User avatar
JimFoxvog
Posts: 2891
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:56 pm
Location: Northern Illinois
Affiliation: MCUSA

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by JimFoxvog »

ken_sylvania wrote: I'm not sure exactly when he was converted either, but I would suggest it may have been either when he met Jesus on the shore of Lake Gennesaret after Jesus' resurrection or when he received the Holy Spirit. According to Jesus statement at the last supper (I have prayed for thee ... when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.), Peter's was not yet converted at that time, even though he knew and believed that Jesus was the Messiah.
Thanks. I know think I understand where you are coming from.

I don't think I've read that verse in the KJV. Most translations are more like this:[bible]Luke 22,32[/bible] After we have doubts or a faith crisis we may turn back to God. I don't see that in the same light as a "conversion" in the way Christians usually use the word, but am thinking over the questioning of that concept in the above few posts.
0 x
Ernie
Posts: 5445
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:48 pm
Location: Central PA
Affiliation: Anabaptist Umbrella
Contact:

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by Ernie »

Last night I visited with a young man who is at #6 but would like to be at #3 or #4.
His hang up is the thing of watching an innocent person suffer but not do anything physical to help.

It struck me that we have such a situation in the NT. Peter saw an innocent man about to suffer and came to his aid. Jesus ordered him to put away his sword because his Kingdom was not of this world.

Would Jesus have ordered the same thing if Peter had attempted to protect an innocent child? I don't know that we can know for sure.
It does seem like there is no end to debate if we look at individual situations.

Non resistance only makes sense to me if I look at the big picture.
For example:
How many innocent people are killed in wars? How many innocent people are killed in communities that resort to lethal self defense? What if Christians in both settings would have returned good for evil. Would less people have been killed throughout history?
Sometimes people need to lay down their lives so that others including future generations can see the futility of harming others.
Thousands of Anabaptists died for their faith, not knowing that they were laying the ground work for hundreds of years of peaceful separation of church and state.

Following Jesus and putting away the sword has long-term results that cannot be measured in the immediate.
0 x
The old woodcutter spoke again. “It is impossible to talk with you. You always draw conclusions. Life is so vast, yet you judge all of life with one page or one word. You see only a fragment. Unless you know the whole story, how can you judge?"
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 23806
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: Non-resistance: Where do you draw the line [POLL]

Post by Josh »

If we believe God is just, will ultimately judge the quick and the dead, and that he offers resurrection to life to any who believe in him and call on his name, then an innocent person being slain or hurt by a wicked person is something we can accept.

If we think this world is all there is, we are driven to try to control it and "fix it". Of course, that just results in a lot more violence.

I think we often don't really think about God's wrath and what the consequences for sin really are. God sees every act of injustice, and wrath is stored up for sinners.

At the same time, for every person who is hurt and broken due to injustice done to them - Jesus offers salvation and a changed life. And he set the example of how to be wronged, hurt, and even killed. Our hope is in resurrection to life.
0 x
Post Reply