CAM Molestation Issue

Christian ethics and theology with an Anabaptist perspective
Ernie
Posts: 5611
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 2:48 pm
Location: Central PA
Affiliation: Anabaptist Umbrella
Contact:

Re: CAM Molestation Issue

Post by Ernie »

Pelerin wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 7:24 pm
Ernie wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 1:58 pm
Pelerin wrote: Mon Jun 06, 2022 12:11 pmYou’ve been very forthright and have been a credit to CAM, though sometimes I think you’re trying to save them from themselves, and that’s often a losing battle.
The underlined is going straight over my head, so if you want enlighten me or share examples here publically or by PM, I am open to that.
What I mean is that CAM seems to have made the decision to hunker down, not say much of anything, and try to ride this out. Ernie, you don’t think that’s the right way to handle it and you see the consequences of that way of handling it. And you like CAM and you want it to do well, so you’re here trying to mitigate some of those consequences for CAM. That’s what I mean by saving them from themselves.
I think you and I are mostly on the same page. I know that I have repeatedly asked on MN that we not lump everyone at CAM into the same group. I'm not sure if we are on the same page on this point.
I could hang out my own laundry list about CAM if I thought that would be helpful in some way.
I would not say that I like CAM. I do very much like some of the people at CAM.
I don't think I view CAM differently from other Plain Anabaptist ministries. I want all of them to do well. Each of the ministries that I am familiar with have their own strengths and weaknesses. Some have more weaknesses than others.
I've been planning to lay down my management role at CAM now for quite a few years. That is scheduled to happen at the end of this month.
I have worked for another large ministry in the past and felt much more comfortable with that organization, but I left that organization as it's mission didn't align with my gifts and calling as well. For what its worth...
2 x
The old woodcutter spoke again. “It is impossible to talk with you. You always draw conclusions. Life is so vast, yet you judge all of life with one page or one word. You see only a fragment. Unless you know the whole story, how can you judge?"
User avatar
steve-in-kville
Posts: 9731
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 5:36 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Affiliation: Hippie Anabaptist

Re: CAM Molestation Issue

Post by steve-in-kville »

Ernie wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 7:43 am
I think you and I are mostly on the same page. I know that I have repeatedly asked on MN that we not lump everyone at CAM into the same group. I'm not sure if we are on the same page on this point.
I could hang out my own laundry list about CAM if I thought that would be helpful in some way.
I would not say that I like CAM. I do very much like some of the people at CAM.
I don't think I view CAM differently from other Plain Anabaptist ministries. I want all of them to do well. Each of the ministries that I am familiar with have their own strengths and weaknesses. Some have more weaknesses than others.
I've been planning to lay down my management role at CAM now for quite a few years. That is scheduled to happen at the end of this month.
I have worked for another large ministry in the past and felt much more comfortable with that organization, but I left that organization as it's mission didn't align with my gifts and calling as well. For what its worth...
I applaud your straight forwardness.
0 x
I self-identify as a conspiracy theorist. My pronouns are told/you/so.

Owner/admin at https://milepost81.com/
My *almost* daily blog: https://milepost81.com/blog/
For railfans: https://milepost81.com/home/random-railfan-posts/
User avatar
Chris
Posts: 737
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 10:58 pm
Affiliation: Moderate / unaffil

Re: CAM Molestation Issue

Post by Chris »

138 pages long.

Would love to see a 1380 page long thread on how much good CAM is doing. :)
0 x
User avatar
steve-in-kville
Posts: 9731
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 5:36 pm
Location: Pennsylvania
Affiliation: Hippie Anabaptist

Re: CAM Molestation Issue

Post by steve-in-kville »

Chris wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 8:25 pm 138 pages long.

Would love to see a 1380 page long thread on how much good CAM is doing. :)
We have yet to have a thread go over a thousand pages. The 'rona thread has potential, though.

Many years ago, a man that served under CAM told me that CAM was a tax haven/money laundering establishment for wealthy mennonites. After dealing with them on a professional level, I am left to wonder....

Start your own thread if you want.
1 x
I self-identify as a conspiracy theorist. My pronouns are told/you/so.

Owner/admin at https://milepost81.com/
My *almost* daily blog: https://milepost81.com/blog/
For railfans: https://milepost81.com/home/random-railfan-posts/
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 24562
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: CAM Molestation Issue

Post by Josh »

steve-in-kville wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 6:40 am
Chris wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 8:25 pm 138 pages long.

Would love to see a 1380 page long thread on how much good CAM is doing. :)
We have yet to have a thread go over a thousand pages. The 'rona thread has potential, though.

Many years ago, a man that served under CAM told me that CAM was a tax haven/money laundering establishment for wealthy mennonites. After dealing with them on a professional level, I am left to wonder....

Start your own thread if you want.
Tax havens and money laundering is not the same as a private charitable foundation, which virtually all rich people give to and take advantage of.
0 x
Ken
Posts: 16539
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2019 12:02 am
Location: Washington State
Affiliation: former MCUSA

Re: CAM Molestation Issue

Post by Ken »

Josh wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 10:00 am
steve-in-kville wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 6:40 am
Chris wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 8:25 pm 138 pages long.

Would love to see a 1380 page long thread on how much good CAM is doing. :)
We have yet to have a thread go over a thousand pages. The 'rona thread has potential, though.

Many years ago, a man that served under CAM told me that CAM was a tax haven/money laundering establishment for wealthy mennonites. After dealing with them on a professional level, I am left to wonder....

Start your own thread if you want.
Tax havens and money laundering is not the same as a private charitable foundation, which virtually all rich people give to and take advantage of.
I agree with Josh here. Charitable giving is not a tax haven or money laundering.

Tax havens or tax shelters are usually business investments that are structured to show a big paper loss in order to balance out business earnings. To cite one famous example, Trump structured his casinos and other business to show an aggregate loss of over $1.1 Billion which he then used for nearly a decade to cancel out future business income and pay no taxes. This is what that looks like: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/201 ... taxes.html

Charities can also be used for money laundering. Citing the Trump example again, the Trump Foundation was used as a tax shelter by the Trump family to launder funds by using the foundation to pay themselves hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax-exempt income. For which they were prosecuted and paid a $2 million fine: https://apnews.com/article/us-news-dona ... 69f32876c5

Whatever you think of CAM, it is a legitimate charity that doesn’t play those sorts of games with its donors. If rich Mennos donate large sums of money to CAM in order to reduce their taxable income that is perfectly legit and no different from any other sort of charitable giving such as people who donate large sums of money to Ivy League universities and take the same tax deductions.

We can talk about whether charitable giving should be tax deductible in the first place. But that is a whole different conversation.
0 x
A fool can throw out more questions than a wise man can answer. -RZehr
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 24562
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 6:23 pm
Location: 1000' ASL
Affiliation: The church of God

Re: CAM Molestation Issue

Post by Josh »

I can agree it overall is morally dubious how our country lets the rich set up lavish foundations that spend huge amounts of money, tax free. But all of the rich do it, and the tax code is written to strongly incentivise that.

I’m not even particularly rich but I get emails from the people whose bank stores my money letting me know they can set up a donor advised fund, letting me “give” money to wherever I wish whilst accruing significant tax benefits and avoiding things like capital gains tax. This is how the system works. The rich wield money and power, at lower tax rates than the labourer who is taxed 15.3% on his first dollar. The rich are taxed 15% on their gains - or 0%, with the right estate and “charitable” planning.
0 x
User avatar
Dan Z
Posts: 2664
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:20 am
Location: Central Minnesota
Affiliation: Conservative Menno

Re: CAM Molestation Issue

Post by Dan Z »

Ken wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 3:52 pm
Josh wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 10:00 am Tax havens and money laundering is not the same as a private charitable foundation, which virtually all rich people give to and take advantage of.
I agree with Josh here...
let's all just pause and live in this moment for a while... :D
6 x
temporal1
Posts: 16556
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2016 12:09 pm
Location: U.S. midwest and PNW
Affiliation: Christian other

Re: CAM Molestation Issue

Post by temporal1 »

steve-in-kville wrote: Wed Jun 08, 2022 6:40 am
Chris wrote: Tue Jun 07, 2022 8:25 pm 138 pages long.
Would love to see a 1380 page long thread on how much good CAM is doing. :)
We have yet to have a thread go over a thousand pages. The 'rona thread has potential, though.

Many years ago, a man that served under CAM told me that CAM was a tax haven/money laundering establishment for wealthy mennonites. After dealing with them on a professional level, I am left to wonder....

Start your own thread if you want.
Mike did it: :wave:

The good that CAM is doing / Anabaptist Theology
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4802
0 x
Most or all of this drama, humiliation, wasted taxpayer money could be spared -
with even modest attempt at presenting balanced facts from the start.


”We’re all just walking each other home.”
UNKNOWN
Post Reply