Wade, in general I have no problem with the main point I think you are trying to make. However, if I may, let me correct a few points you made in the above abbreviation of the last post you made.Wade wrote:Most Anabaptist history books we have start off defending why Munster was not an Anabaptist - remember from my background it seems everybody is just rewriting history to suit their own agenda.
So when I have the feeling that Mennonites are proud of their heritage and history including the time of the Russian Mennonites, imagine my horror and dismay when just a year ago I read, "Why I take not the Sword," by Isaac Theissen...
Now why are Mennonites quick to say they are Russian Mennonite descendants and completely leave out the details they were rich, beat their slaves, avoided being drafted to war but still took up arms and killed people, but yet are very quick to tell about how Catholics and Protestants killed our forefathers and so strongly encourage reading books like the Martyrs Mirror that is just rehearsing offenses from others?
First I would be interested in even seeing one history book that stated that Munster was not an Anabaptist. Seeing that Munster is a place... But if you are referring to the people living there I get your point. They were not by the way. They were not accepted as Anabaptist by the majority of other Anabaptists of their time. saying I am a donkey does not make me one regardless what some may think.
As to the part about Russian Mennonite background people leaving out the details of their background that you mention. Perhaps it is because many of them did not participate in those types of activities. I am not sure of the groups you came in contact with but many many Russian Mennonites immigrated here long before some of the things you mentioned took place at least in great numbers. And not nearly all of them were rich.
But I still agree that we are not immune from glossing over negative aspects of our background.