MennoNet.com

Because it just isn;t fun unless Boot and I go at it a bit.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/10202/rep ... es-barrett

Robert wrote:Because it just isn;t fun unless Boot and I go at it a bit.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/10202/rep ... es-barrett

This was probably one of the subjects I didn't miss...

Robert wrote:Because it just isn;t fun unless Boot and I go at it a bit.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/10202/rep ... es-barrett

So, what happened to Bootstrap?

Can we please stop trotting out the partisan political hot button issues over and over again?

gcdonner wrote:

Robert wrote:Because it just isn;t fun unless Boot and I go at it a bit.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/10202/rep ... es-barrett

So, what happened to Bootstrap?

Bootstrap prefers to have scientific discussions among scientists, and is sick of partisan political hot button debates.

lesterb wrote:
This was probably one of the subjects I didn't miss...

X2

Bootstrap wrote: Bootstrap prefers to have scientific discussions among scientists, and is sick of partisan political hot button debates.

Or could it be that it is starting to be revealed that some scientists lie and the climate issue is being used as a political tool instead of an environmental condition?

Robert wrote:

Bootstrap wrote:Bootstrap prefers to have scientific discussions among scientists, and is sick of partisan political hot button debates.

Or could it be that it is starting to be revealed that some scientists lie and the climate issue is being used as a political tool instead of an environmental condition?

Baiting?

Seriously, there are websites that cover all of this very well. We often seem to keep repeating the same topics, with the same opinions, and little new data. If you want to understand the data and the science in sufficient depth to have an opinion, you probably won't find what you need on a religious site anyway. Or in The Daily Mail.