Sure, but “much of eastern Oregon”? Why stop rewinding time there, where it only impacts people in eastern Oregon? How about all of North America? Why should the government return eastern Oregon but not the land you own? Nothing is keeping you from giving title to your land to them, is there?Ken wrote:Most of eastern Oregon was originally stolen from the Paiute people (as well as Shoshone Nez Perce, Cayuse and Umatilla people). If Federal lands are going to be disposed of in eastern Oregon, by right it should go to the descendants of the original rightful inhabitants, not the descendants of the "squatter" ranchers who stole it from them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Paiute_peopleJudas Maccabeus wrote:No where near as much as if ADM or ConAgara owned it. You ok with me staking out 160 acres and moving in? Right next to you?RZehr wrote:Sure, permission should be given. But there was no damage to anything with that fire.
I live in a wild fire prone area too, my house borders 80,000 acre national grassland where there was lightning fireS and controlled burns last year. I know what you are talking about.
Nonetheless, that particular case didn’t cause anything to worry about.
Much more damage was caused by rioters burning things they didn’t own without permission.
Over half of the state of Oregon is owned by the federal government. That is an economic problem for rural Oregon. It’s similar to an single person owning 52% of a state. It’s wealth consolidation and control.
J. M.
In fact, the Malheur reserve that was occupied by the Bundy folks was also stolen from the Paiutes who were forcibly relocated to the Yakima reservation in central Washington to make room for white settlers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malheur_I ... eservation
I’m not saying it should be given to rancher descendants.
The 80,000 near me was homesteaded, who then went broke in the dust bowl era, then the government bought it from them for pennies.
It’s complicated when people and nations operate outside of Gods way. America has been informed partially by Christianity, but not wholly, which produces some bastardized society where this nation took land by force, just about like every country, but then feels guilty.
Slavery is wrong, and the Christian thing to do is to make it right. But the left (which is pushing for it) doesn’t like Christianity. And without any sort of anchored morality, on what basis should wrongs be made right?
Christians ought to be natural allies of making wrongs right, but they are too invested? in right wing politics, or no politics at all to do it.