Dan,Dan Z wrote: ↑Mon Nov 22, 2021 1:06 pmWhat is behind the narratives that are so compelling that they move otherwise reasonable people to embrace (or at least defend) the use of violence against their fellow citizens? How do (well-meaning?) hooligan vandals on a Kenosha street at 1 AM become "the voice of the unheard,"
Do you really think the rioters in Kenosha were well-meaning?
The people Rittenhouse killed included a convicted pedophile and a convicted domestic abuser.
Why are such people who are rioting, setting fires, and destroying property of innocent people considered "well meaning"?
Do you have any proof he had a "G I Joe" fantasy? He'd spent the day before the riots helping clean up and paint over graffiti that past rioters had left in Kenosha.or how does a (well-meaning?) 17-year old kid with a G-I Joe fantasy become a defender of liberty? We're in the midst of an epistemological meltdown. As a society, we are not handling the information age well - and that makes us all vulnerable to exploitation.
Ultimately, I think it's acceptable for citizens to defend themselves, their communities, and their property against violent rioters.
Rittenhouse's conflict with the rioters started when he tried to put out a fire in a dumpster. Do you think it's wrong to put out fires?