MennoNet.com

Cuz we had it.
Cuz George whined about it.

Because it just isn;t fun unless Boot and I go at it a bit.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/10202/rep ... es-barrett

RZehr wrote:I really miss the posts from Stoltz13, Knightlight, Truthseeker, and many others that were no longer active when I joined.

Yep. People. I miss people.

temporal1 wrote:interesting that it's a .com site, not .org.
i'm sure there are reasons.

Most are more familiar with .coms. Same reason why we used it for MennoNet.

I would question being asked for photo ID. They would have to prove to me they are who they are before I would verify I am who I am. Hackers do similar things to get info. Be very careful.

We have a two step registration process to help filter out automatic processes and spammers, this being the second step. We ask each new member to reply with a post here so we can verify their intent. Please post one or two sentences about you or what you are looking for. We will approve you and yo...

Better?

yeah, i guess that's one change that might not go very well. :-| the earliest members are definitely left out! :shock: I used this same registration method on MD. It helps to filter out the spammers and bots. The instructions as for one or two lines to validate you as a human. It doesn't ask for a ...

I for one would really appreciate if he were a bit more forth coming. Why not just say what happened? Keeping people in the dark is not a good strategy for relationship with others. In fact, it breeds suspicion and distrust. Hans shared that the server crashed, they lost all the data and there was ...

Mrs.Nisly wrote:Where is the thread of introduction and intent that I had to post on before I was accepted on to the forum?

It hides once you are activated only to be seen by newly registered members. Sneaky, ain't it?