MennoNet.com

So basically the court was 9-0 on whether this was a federal or state issue, which was the main issue in front of them. But the court split 5-4 on whether it is solely an area for Congress to decide (as opposed to the courts). And in the end, they made no actual ruling on Trump's qualification to b...

1. I think courts are the proper forum to determine the meaning of constitutional provisions and not Congress. The Court's primary role is to interpret the Constitution, including clarifying the extent and limits of the powers and duties assigned to different branches of government, including Congr...

Ken, I think you are mostly saying: 1. You disagree with the Supreme Court decision, and 2. You wish Congress would act to disqualify Trump Is that right? And you are mostly giving reasons you wish that would happen? I disagree with the Supreme Court punting on this issue. I think that was a partis...

Ken, I think you are mostly saying:

1. You disagree with the Supreme Court decision, and
2. You wish Congress would act to disqualify Trump

Is that right? And you are mostly giving reasons you wish that would happen?

Robert wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 10:19 am Interesting perspective.

Any evidence that this is true? Something we can look at? He makes a lot of very concrete claims. Should be easy to show the proof if they are true. He says he actually looked at the evidence.

Josh wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 12:15 pm

Ernie wrote: ↑Mon May 06, 2024 12:04 pm but on the same scale as Gaza?

The operation in Iraq was much larger scale. Of course, it didn’t work in the long run.

How are you measuring scale?

Now lets get back on topic. Could you please clarify what the topic is, and what is on or off topic? A few pages back, I suggested that the topic of this thread is "Is Trump legally qualified to be a presidential candidate?", which the Supreme Court seems to have settled. Is that the topi...

I don’t think pointing out someone is of poor character is “as hominem”. Basically. I don’t think people of poor character and with a fundamentally anti-Christian worldview are the right place to go for either the truth or facts. Actually, I think this the very definition of "ad hominem"....

Now lets get back on topic. Could you please clarify what the topic is, and what is on or off topic? A few pages back, I suggested that the topic of this thread is "Is Trump legally qualified to be a presidential candidate?", which the Supreme Court seems to have settled. Is that the topic?

But I think there's a deep skepticism that facts exist at all. I think absolute truth exists and is embodied in Jesus, the Logos. I also think “facts” exist as a subset of this. I agree with you about truth from a biblical perspective. But I think the Bible also talks about false witness and gossip...