MennoNet.com

barnhart wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:37 pm

JM wrote: A book burning of Grudem’s systematic theology maybe?

I just choose not to buy a copy, but I sympathize with the sentiment.

It is a guilt offering in atonement for my abrupt response to the others here.

More than one truth can be present. Did the abuse scandals cost the Balt Archdiocese financially? Absolutely Did they wait too late to do consolidation due to dwindling numbers? Unquestionably Was this Archdiocese led well over the years? Heck no. Did you know the unofficial but widely used nicknam...

brothereicher wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:44 pm

Soloist wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:39 pm

ken_sylvania wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:35 pm ">

Looks like New Orleans after Katrina

My fat fingers are partially to blame.

Looks like the whole Southern Seminary library went up.

Once again you obscure what is a simple question. Do you agree with reformed theology? Yes or no. Refusing to answer simply means that you are trying to hide your position. Are you doing this to continue to appeal to people who reject your position? Only cults try to hide their views, Judas Maccabe...

That being said, I still reject Stone-Campbell theology, and believe it to be false doctrine,

Fortunately, there's an easy way to clear this up: Do you agree with reformed theology? Yes or no? I cannot subscribe to the Belgic confession, the Heidelberg Catechism and the Cannons of Dort. I also reject large portions of the Westminster confession. This would mean I am clearly not reformed as ...

If you call me “reformed” I will expect you to justify it through actual reformed doctrinal sources. I doubt you are familiar with any of them. Fortunately, there's an easy way to clear this up: Do you agree with reformed theology? Yes or no? I cannot subscribe to the Belgic confession, the Heidelb...

Thank you for the quote, I love it. And if I call you Reformed in the future, I'll do my best to ensure my audience knows it's done without your consent. If you call me “reformed” I will expect you to justify it through actual reformed doctrinal sources. I doubt you are familiar with any of them. I...

I'm not sure God fits in your box. But it is a question that will surely be asked. If you refuse to give a direct answer, the question arises,why? Are you try to obscure what you really believe? What if they ask if you've stopped beating your wife yet? Why not simply answer the question with a yes ...

You are both right and wrong here. You are correct in that the government did a disparate impact analysis. That is standard. Where you are incorrect is in the assertion that disparate impacts are by definition discriminatory. That is untrue. All an employer has to do is demonstrate that the standar...