MennoNet.com

I don't know who they are. Do you? Probably some ranking members of the House who have parliamentary roles of some sort like House clerk or parliamentarian. I didn't watch the speech so can't comment on the content. https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2023/02/GettyImages-1246878821-1024x68...

Ken wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 10:57 pm Feel free to provide any evidence or argument you have that anyone involved in the ballot access process in CO or ME did something illegal or unethical. And we Ken will take a look at itdeny it.

Fixed it for you

No, insurrection is illegal under Federal law. It simply isn't the jurisdiction of the State Court to criminally try Trump for the Federal crime of insurrection. It is, however, within their jurisdiction to administer State elections. And absent any ruling or clarity at the Federal level they did t...

He was found to have engaged in insurrection, which makes him ineligible to hold the office of the President. The criminality of engaging in insurrection is a different issue and the subject of the criminal courts, not elections officials. OK, so perhaps he engaged in non-criminal insurrection... N...

Maybe what will could happen soon is Lex could stop his Jew-baiting.

He was found to have engaged in insurrection, which makes him ineligible to hold the office of the President. The criminality of engaging in insurrection is a different issue and the subject of the criminal courts, not elections officials. OK, so perhaps he engaged in non-criminal insurrection...

Fifth, it is actually the JOB of the courts to interpret the law when it is ambiguous as is the case with Trump's ballot access. In this case the Secretary of State of Colorado didn't just throw Trump off the ballot. What happened was some Republicans in CO challenged Trump's access to the ballot a...

Fifth, it is actually the JOB of the courts to interpret the law when it is ambiguous as is the case with Trump's ballot access. In this case the Secretary of State of Colorado didn't just throw Trump off the ballot. What happened was some Republicans in CO challenged Trump's access to the ballot a...

Ken wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2024 9:08 pm So as of today, Trump has been found to have illegally engaged in insurrection against the US and no court have overruled that finding.

So he was found to have illegally engaged in insurrection but not found to have committed a crime?

It is, apparently, a serious offense against the constitution to interfere with the elections, including such actions as miscounting votes or attempting to influence others to do so. One would think that attempts to remove a candidate from the ballot by anyone who is not authorized to do so would fa...